Read today’s Hindu editorial which talks about “”. These daily Hindu editorial articles will give you a set of new words daily to learn along with their contextual meanings.
Difficult Words & their Meanings
| Difficult Word/Phrase | Contextual Meaning |
| abstaining | to decide not to use your vote |
| unwillingness | not wanting to do something |
| endorsing | to make a public statement of your approval or support |
| stubborn | something which is hard to deal with |
| pervasive | present or noticeable |
| credible | able to be believed or trusted |
| deficit | the amount by which something, especially an amount of money, is smaller than it should be |
| consensual | with the willing agreement of all |
| surveillance | careful watching of someone especially by the police or army |
| reconciliation | process of making two opposite beliefs, ideas, or situations agree |
| pragmatism | an approach to problems and situations that is based on practical solutions |
SSC CHSL Tier I free mock test
Tactical abstention: On the U.N. Human Rights Council resolution on Sri Lanka
India was keen not to lose diplomatic space to persuade Sri Lanka on devolution for Tamils
By abstaining (to decide not to use your vote) from the vote on the U.N. Human Rights Council resolution on Sri Lanka, India has signalled its unwillingness (not wanting to do something) to upset its neighbour. At the same time, it does not want to be seen as ignoring Sri Lanka’s reluctance to meet the political aspirations of the Tamils or endorsing (to make a public statement of your approval or support) the country’s stubborn (something which is hard to deal with) refusal to ensure any sort of accountability for its war-time past. It may be easy for the political opposition to dismiss India’s abstention as showing an intent to shield Sri Lanka from a credible investigation into allegations of war crimes. A more reasonable assessment would be that India seems to have utilised the opportunity to preserve its diplomatic space and to contain the pervasive (present or noticeable) influence of China over Sri Lanka even while maintaining its support for the Tamil minority to achieve equality, justice, dignity and peace. India has not been comfortable with externally mandated investigative mechanisms. Even when it voted in 2012 in favour of a credible (able to be believed or trusted) investigation into human rights, India had got the resolution to incorporate the need for Sri Lanka’s ‘concurrence’ to any assistance that the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights may offer in such a probe. In this session and just ahead of the vote, India stressed on both meaningful devolution to meet Tamil aspirations and the unity and integrity of Sri Lanka — aspects that it believes are not an ‘either-or’ choice.
The resolution comes amidst disturbing signs that Sri Lanka is regressing into the days of democratic deficit (the amount by which something, especially an amount of money, is smaller than it should be) seen prior to the 2015 elections. Unfortunately, the present regime withdrew from the commitments made to the UNHRC by its predecessor on constructive engagement with the international community, and the consensual (with the willing agreement of all) resolution on justice and accountability. The UN High Commissioner’s report raises concern over increasing militarisation, heightened surveillance (careful watching of someone especially by the police or army) against rights defenders and NGOs, interference with the few prosecutions in emblematic cases from the past, and the dangerous anti-minority rhetoric. India’s concerns in Sri Lanka have always been different from the rest of the international community, informed by a sense of the long-term well-being of the Tamils, and that power-sharing does foster reconciliation (process of making two opposite beliefs, ideas, or situations agree). Hence its emphasis on devolution rather than accountability. It is clear that India has its own limitations in expressing disappointment over the island nation’s move away from reconciliation and devolution. It continues to be weighed down by the Chinese presence in the region. Even the need to be in accord with sentiment in Tamil Nadu in the midst of an election was not motivation enough for India to change its position from tactical neutrality to one of open support for the resolution. When pragmatism (an approach to problems and situations that is based on practical solutions) and principle were needed in equal measure, the Centre seems to have chosen abstention as an easy way out.
SSC CHSL Tier I free mock test
This is all from us related to today’s Hindu editorial article.
- Sign Up on Practicemock for Updated Current Affairs, Free Topic Tests and Free Mini Mocks
- Sign Up Here to Download Free Study Material
Free Mock Tests for the Upcoming Exams
- RRB PO 2024 Free Mock Test
- RRB Clerk 2024 Free Mock Test
- SSC MTS Free Mock Test
- SSC CHSL Free Mock Test
- SSC CGL Free Mock Test
- GATE Mechanical Free Mock Test
- GATE Civil Free Mock Test
- NABARD Gr. A Free Mock Test
- SBI Clerk Mains Free Mock Test
- SSC CPO Free Mock Test
- AFCAT Free Mock Test
- CAT Free Mock Test
- NIACL Assistant Free Mock Test
- UIIC AO Free Mock Test
- UIIC Assistant Free Mock Test
- GIC Assistant Manager Free Mock Test
- NICL AO Free Mock Test
- Free SSC Live Test
- UPSC CSAT Free Mock Test
- CDS-I Free Mock Test
- RRB ALP Free Mock Test