Sign up to Download RBI Grade B PYQ PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Why India’s fertility problem may be worse than what headline figures suggest<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Context<\/strong>: \u00a0India’s Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has fallen to 1.9 nationally, as confirmed by both the 2024 SRS report and provisional NFHS-6 data released this week \u2014 below the commonly cited replacement level of 2.1. But the headline figure understates the real problem. India’s actual replacement rate, once adjusted for its own sex ratio and female survival data, is 2.2 \u2014 not 2.1. Against that corrected benchmark, the fertility shortfall is wider than the standard comparison suggests, and the southern states, highly urbanised regions, and West Bengal are already in structurally declining territory. Simultaneously, the Andhra Pradesh government has proposed cash and in-kind incentives for parents who have a third and fourth child \u2014 a complete policy reversal for a country with a 70-year history of population control. This analysis unpacks the demographic arithmetic, the regional divergence, the shift in fertility aspirations, and what the headline leaves unexamined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n
India’s Fertility Position \u2014 The Numbers<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n\nNational TFR in 2024:\u00a01.9<\/strong>\u00a0children per woman, down from 2.9 in 1998\u201399. This is the first time India’s TFR has fallen below 2.0 at the national level.<\/li>\n\n\n\nUrban TFR:\u00a01.5<\/strong>\u00a0| Rural TFR:\u00a02.1<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 a sharp urban-rural divergence that will widen as urbanisation accelerates.<\/li>\n\n\n\nThe standard replacement rate of 2.1 assumes 98% of girls survive to reproductive age and a sex ratio at birth of 952 girls per 1,000 boys.<\/li>\n\n\n\n India’s actual 2024 sex ratio at birth:\u00a0918 girls per 1,000 boys<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 well below the natural ratio.<\/li>\n\n\n\nIndia’s female survival to age 15:\u00a096.4%<\/strong>\u00a0nationally \u2014 below the 98% assumption embedded in the 2.1 benchmark.<\/li>\n\n\n\nOnce corrected for India’s own mortality and sex ratio data, India’s\u00a0adjusted replacement rate is 2.2<\/strong>, not 2.1. The fertility shortfall is therefore larger than the standard headline comparison suggests.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Two Components Driving the Decline<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n TFR is a product of two variables \u2014 the proportion of women having children, and the average number of children born per woman. Both are moving adversely in India simultaneously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Component 1 \u2014 Rising childlessness:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nShare of women aged 40\u201349 who were childless at end of reproductive life:\u00a07% in 2015\u201316 (NFHS-4) \u2192 12% in 2019\u201321 (NFHS-5).<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\nNFHS-6 (2023\u201324) data on this metric has not yet been released, but the directional trend is expected to continue.<\/li>\n\n\n\n While 12% is still low by global standards (some advanced countries are close to 20%), the pace of increase \u2014 nearly doubling in five years \u2014 is fast.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nComponent 2 \u2014 Shift to smaller families:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nThe share of women aged 45\u201349 having three or more children fell sharply between NFHS-3 (2005\u201306) and NFHS-5 (2019\u201321).<\/li>\n\n\n\n The old two-child norm is giving way to a one-child or no-child preference, particularly in urban India.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Wanted fertility rate \u2014 the TFR that would result if all unwanted births were prevented \u2014 is falling across both low-fertility and high-fertility states, confirming that the aspiration shift is nationwide, not regional.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nIndia’s Demographic Position \u2014 The Broader Context<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\nIndia’s demographic transition:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nIndia crossed China to become the world’s most populous country in 2023, with a population of approximately 1.44 billion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n India’s demographic dividend \u2014 a large working-age population relative to dependents \u2014 is a structural growth driver that most economists project will peak around 2040\u20132045.<\/li>\n\n\n\n After that peak, the dependency ratio will begin to rise as the population ages, particularly in states that have already been at sub-replacement fertility for 15\u201320 years.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Southern states \u2014 Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana \u2014 have been at sub-replacement TFR since the early 2000s. They are not entering a new phase; they are 20 years ahead of the northern states in the demographic transition.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe parliamentary representation dimension:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nIndia’s delimitation exercise \u2014 redrawing of Lok Sabha and state assembly constituencies based on population \u2014 has been frozen since 1976. The freeze was specifically designed to prevent states with successful family planning from being penalised with reduced parliamentary seats.<\/li>\n\n\n\n The freeze is constitutionally scheduled to be revisited after 2026. Southern states, with lower populations due to decades of sub-replacement fertility, stand to lose Lok Sabha seats if delimitation is carried out on the basis of current population data.<\/li>\n\n\n\n This is not an abstract concern. It is a live political conflict between north and south India, with major implications for federal fiscal transfers, political representation, and the incentive structure for family planning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe ageing dimension:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nStates with sub-replacement fertility for 20+ years are already experiencing labour shortages, rising old-age dependency, and fiscal pressure on pension and healthcare systems.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Kerala’s old-age dependency ratio is the highest in India. The state government has already flagged the fiscal strain of managing an ageing population with a shrinking working-age base.<\/li>\n\n\n\n The policy reversal in Andhra Pradesh \u2014 from population control to birth incentivisation \u2014 reflects this structural anxiety.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nGlobal precedents India should watch:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nSouth Korea’s TFR fell to 0.75 \u00a0in 2023 \u2014 the lowest ever recorded for any country. Despite decades of pro-natalist cash incentives, the trend has not reversed. The Korean experience suggests that financial incentives alone cannot reverse the aspiration-driven decline in fertility.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Japan has been running pro-natalist policy since the 1990s with limited success. Population has been shrinking since 2011.<\/li>\n\n\n\n China’s removal of the one-child policy (2015) and subsequent two-child and three-child policy have produced only modest upticks in births. TFR remains below 1.1.<\/li>\n\n\n\n The common thread across all three: once fertility aspirations shift \u2014 driven by education, urbanisation, financial cost of child-rearing, and changing gender roles \u2014 cash transfers and incentives have at best marginal and temporary effects.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nDecoding the Article: Analysis<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n\u00a0The Adjusted Replacement Rate Changes the Entire Story<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nIndia’s headline TFR shortfall looks like 0.2 (1.9 vs standard replacement of 2.1). But India’s actual replacement rate is 2.2, not 2.1 \u2014 because India’s sex ratio at birth is only 918 girls per 1,000 boys (vs natural 952) and only 96.4% of females survive to age 15 (vs assumed 98%).<\/li>\n\n\n\n Once corrected, the real shortfall becomes 0.3 \u2014 50% larger than the headline implies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n States that appear “close to replacement” at TFR 2.0\u20132.1 are still below their own state-specific adjusted replacement rates.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Only Kerala has an adjusted replacement rate at or below 2.1 due to its better sex ratio and female survival outcomes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Bottom line: the 2.1 benchmark is a developed-country standard and should not be applied to India without adjustment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\u00a0The Wanted Fertility Rate Is the More Important Number<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nThe article mentions the wanted fertility rate in passing, but it deserves more weight. TFR captures what is happening. Wanted TFR captures what people aspire to \u2014 and it is falling even faster than actual TFR.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Wanted fertility rates are declining in both low-fertility states (Telangana, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh) and high-fertility states (Bihar, UP, Jharkhand). This means the aspiration shift is ahead of the behaviour shift \u2014 actual TFR in high-fertility states will continue to fall as aspirations translate into behaviour over the next 10\u201315 years.<\/li>\n\n\n\n The implication: India’s national TFR of 1.9 is not a floor. It is a point on a downward curve. Without a structural change in the cost and feasibility of child-rearing, TFR will continue falling, narrowing the gap between India and the demographically distressed East Asian economies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe Andhra Pradesh Incentive Programme Is Almost Certainly Insufficient<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nThe article reports Andhra Pradesh’s proposed cash and in-kind incentives for a third and fourth child without evaluating whether such programmes actually work.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Global evidence is not encouraging. South Korea has spent the equivalent of hundreds of billions of dollars on pro-natalist incentives over two decades; TFR has continued to fall. Japan and China have had similar experiences.<\/li>\n\n\n\n The drivers of fertility decline in India \u2014 rising education of women, delayed marriage age, urbanisation, high financial cost of raising children in a competitive education environment, and changing gender role aspirations \u2014 are structural. They are not addressable by one-time cash transfers.<\/li>\n\n\n\n What the article identifies but does not state plainly: the Andhra Pradesh programme is likely to have a limited demographic impact but significant political symbolism. It signals that the state government recognises the problem. It does not solve it<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe Fine Print \u2014 What the Article Does Not Say Loudly Enough<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n\nNFHS-6 (2023\u201324) data on childlessness has not yet been released.<\/strong>\u00a0The article cites the 12% childlessness figure from NFHS-5 (2019\u201321). Given the pace of change \u2014 7% in 2015\u201316 to 12% in 2019\u201321 \u2014 the 2023\u201324 figure could be materially higher. The full picture of aspiration-driven demographic change is not yet visible in official data.<\/li>\n\n\n\nThe delimitation freeze is the political subtext the article does not name.<\/strong>\u00a0The fertility divergence between north and south is not just a demographic statistic. It is a politically explosive issue about parliamentary representation. Southern states have been vocal about the risk of losing Lok Sabha seats after delimitation.<\/li>\n\n\n\nThe wanted fertility rate data cited is from NFHS-5 (2019\u201321).<\/strong>\u00a0The article acknowledges that detailed NFHS-6 data are not yet released. The wanted fertility trend may have shifted further between 2021 and 2024, particularly given post-COVID changes in urban family formation patterns. The analysis is based on the most current available data, but readers should note the lag.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nWhat to Watch<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n\nNFHS-6 detailed data release (expected 2026)<\/strong>: the leading demographic signal \u2014 the provisional NFHS-6 data released on 30 May 2026 confirmed the TFR trend, but age-specific fertility rates, childlessness data, and wanted fertility rates by state and urban-rural split have not yet been published. When the full NFHS-6 dataset is released, it will either confirm or sharpen the aspiration shift picture visible in NFHS-5. A childlessness figure above 15% for urban women aged 40\u201349 would mark a qualitative shift in India’s demographic trajectory and is the single most watched number in this space.<\/li>\n\n\n\nDelimitation Commission timeline and terms of reference<\/strong>: the structural political signal \u2014 India’s next delimitation exercise is constitutionally due after 2026. The terms of reference \u2014 specifically, whether seat allocation will be based on current population or adjusted to protect states with better family planning outcomes \u2014 will determine whether sub-replacement fertility carries a political penalty for southern states. Any announcement on delimitation methodology will immediately trigger a north-south political debate on demographic equity and federal representation. This is the leading indicator of how seriously the political system will engage with the fertility divergence.<\/li>\n\n\n\nState-level pro-natalist policy spread and fiscal commitment<\/strong>: the lagging policy signal \u2014 Andhra Pradesh’s incentive programme is likely to be followed by other southern states. The question is not whether incentives will be announced; it is whether they will be funded adequately and whether they will go beyond cash transfers to address structural barriers \u2014 affordable childcare, maternity protections, housing, and flexible work.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nIndia’s fertility problem is not a single crisis \u2014 it is three overlapping transitions arriving at different speeds in different parts of the country: the north is still completing its demographic transition toward replacement, the south is 20 years past it and managing the consequences, and urban India is converging rapidly toward East Asian fertility patterns that no country has successfully reversed once established. The Andhra Pradesh incentive programme marks the point at which Indian policymakers have officially acknowledged the problem. Whether they have the tools \u2014 or the political consensus \u2014 to address it is a different question entirely.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
India’s fertility rate has fallen to 1.9, but adjusted replacement levels reveal a deeper demographic challenge with major economic and political implications.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":202146,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4022],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-vishleshan"],"yoast_head":"\n
Why India's fertility problem may be worse than what headline figures suggest<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"India's fertility rate has fallen to 1.9, but adjusted replacement levels reveal a deeper demographic challenge with major economic and political implications.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why India's fertility problem may be worse than what headline figures suggest\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"India's fertility rate has fallen to 1.9, but adjusted replacement levels reveal a deeper demographic challenge with major economic and political implications.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Practicemock\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-02T10:12:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-02T10:12:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Abhishek Jatariya\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Abhishek Jatariya\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why India's fertility problem may be worse than what headline figures suggest","description":"India's fertility rate has fallen to 1.9, but adjusted replacement levels reveal a deeper demographic challenge with major economic and political implications.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why India's fertility problem may be worse than what headline figures suggest","og_description":"India's fertility rate has fallen to 1.9, but adjusted replacement levels reveal a deeper demographic challenge with major economic and political implications.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/","og_site_name":"Practicemock","article_published_time":"2026-06-02T10:12:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-02T10:12:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Abhishek Jatariya","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Abhishek Jatariya","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Abhishek Jatariya","@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c31174d4112cf4e827e441653855a4df"},"headline":"Vishleshan for Regulatory Exams 02 June 2026 | Why India’s fertility problem may be worse than what headline figures suggest","datePublished":"2026-06-02T10:12:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-02T10:12:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/"},"wordCount":1896,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp","articleSection":["Vishleshan"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/","name":"Why India's fertility problem may be worse than what headline figures suggest","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-02T10:12:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-02T10:12:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c31174d4112cf4e827e441653855a4df"},"description":"India's fertility rate has fallen to 1.9, but adjusted replacement levels reveal a deeper demographic challenge with major economic and political implications.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"Vishleshan for Regulatory Exams 02 June 2026"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/vishleshan-for-regulatory-exams-02-june-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vishleshan","item":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/category\/vishleshan\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Vishleshan for Regulatory Exams 02 June 2026"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/","name":"Practicemock","description":"Practice | Analyse | Excel","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c31174d4112cf4e827e441653855a4df","name":"Abhishek Jatariya","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9772e4cf088bd611a88ade1061b1e4faa0cfb9f1bbfb91714bd7d8c9af75c6b3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9772e4cf088bd611a88ade1061b1e4faa0cfb9f1bbfb91714bd7d8c9af75c6b3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9772e4cf088bd611a88ade1061b1e4faa0cfb9f1bbfb91714bd7d8c9af75c6b3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Abhishek Jatariya"},"description":"Hello Guys, I am Abhishek Jatariya (B.Tech (IT), HBTU Kanpur). At PracticeMock I am a dedicated Government Job aspirant turned passionate Content writer & Content creator. My blogs are a one-stop destination for accurate and comprehensive information on exams like SSC, Railways, and Other PSU Jobs. I am on a mission to provide you with all the details about these exams you need, conveniently in one place. I hope you will like my writing.","sameAs":["https:\/\/in.linkedin.com\/in\/abhishek-jatariya"],"url":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/author\/abhishek-jatariya\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",1200,675,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",150,84,false],"medium":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",300,169,false],"medium_large":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",640,360,false],"large":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",640,360,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",1200,675,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",1200,675,false],"web-stories-poster-portrait":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",640,360,false],"web-stories-publisher-logo":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",96,54,false],"web-stories-thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Vishleshan-for-Regulatory-Exams-02-June-2026.webp",150,84,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Abhishek Jatariya","author_link":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/author\/abhishek-jatariya\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"India's fertility rate has fallen to 1.9, but adjusted replacement levels reveal a deeper demographic challenge with major economic and political implications.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202141\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/202146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.practicemock.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/vish02_Optimized.webp\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n