The Hindu Editorial Vocabulary– Sep 30, 2022; Day 361

Talent and recognition: On reducing number of science awards

Awards in science are a source of encouragement, and should not be cut down

The Centre has decided that awards, prizes and fellowships by various ministries and departments need a wholesale relook (a reconsideration or re-examination of something). The Ministry of Home Affairs, which is executing this directive (A pronouncement encouraging or banning some activity), has moved much beyond its usual remit (release) of awards for police officers and gallantry (The qualities of a hero or heroine; exceptional or heroic courage when facing danger (especially in battle)) medals and irrupted (enter somewhere forcibly or suddenly) into the world of scientific and medical research. India’s scientific ministries recently made presentations to the Union Home Secretary, Ajay Bhalla, on awards given to scientists at different stages of their career. They also had to list out which were ‘National Awards’ and which were funded out of private endowments (The capital that provides income for an institution). Though a final call is yet to be taken, the quorum (A gathering of the minimal number of members of an organization to conduct business) — and this consisted of the Secretaries, or the heads of each of these ministries — was of the opinion that most awards ought (used to express natural expectation) to be done away with (Terminate, end, or take out) and ministries could either retain only some of the National Awards or institute one or two ‘high status’ awards. The rationale for pruning (Weed out unwanted or unnecessary things), Mr. Bhalla has said, follows from a “vision” of Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding “Transformation of the Awards Ecosystem”. In 2018, Mr. Modi had said that his government had modified the system of the Padma awards and ensured it recognised ordinary people doing selfless work rather than well-known personalities who repeatedly bag (take possession of) them. The awards, Mr. Bhalla has said, ought to be restricted, and have a transparent selection process.

Awards and prizes recognise achievement, but in science and medical research, they are also meant to spur (Incite or stimulate) younger scientists towards loftier (Of high moral or intellectual value; elevated in nature or style), imaginative goals. Unlike in sport — or even gallantry awards — where it is relatively easier to define a set of benchmarks (A standard by which something can be measured or judged) and confer (Grant a qualification, title, right, possession, etc.) medals on achievers, scientific research is open ended, circuitous (Marked by obliqueness or indirection in speech or conduct) and — as the history of science reveals — punctuated (draw attention to (something)) by lucky breaks. It is possible to train talented youth to be Olympians or international cricketers but impossible to create an Einstein or a Chandrasekhar. Almost every Nobel Laureate in the modern era has won various secondary prizes and recognition in their early career and every year; there is as much debate on who was omitted (Prevent from being included, considered or accepted) as on the person who won. Recognising early career potential will remain fraught (Filled with or attended with) with subjectivity and, with fewer awards on offer, could provoke increased discontent. Contrary to the Prime Minister’s vision, fewer awards may actually miss many more promising talents and amplify (Increase in size, volume or significance) epaulettes (Adornment consisting of an ornamental cloth pad worn on the shoulder) to the already decorated. Awards cost ministries money but the meeting did not discuss whether cutting costs was a factor in the rationalisation. As it is unclear what existing problem the new scheme solves, the Centre should reconsider the merits of its proposal.

Want to improve your vocabulary further? Download the Lists of Word-Meanings of Previous Months here.