The Hindu Editorial Vocabulary– Dec 27, 2022; Day 391

Power roller-coaster (a feeling, situation, or experience that changes very quickly): On Maoists and UML sharing power in Nepal

The Maoists and the UML are back to sharing power despite not winning the mandate for it

There seems to be no limit to the opportunism in Nepal’s top polity (A politically organized unit). Newly minted Prime Minister Pushpa Kumar Dahal’s Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist-Centre) was part of a six-party alliance led by the Nepali Congress that collectively finished just above the absolute majority mark in the parliamentary elections held in November. The CPN(M-C) won just 11.13% of the votes, getting 32 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives. The party’s poor performance was hardly any disincentive (A negative motivational influence) for Mr. Dahal to claim the post of prime minister from his party’s senior partner, the NC. After being denied this, legitimately, in his blatant (Without any attempt at concealment; completely obvious) hunger for power, he immediately took the expedient (Appropriate to a purpose; practical) route of aligning with the leading Opposition party, the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) led by Khadga Prasad Oli, securing the Prime Minister’s post, for a period of half of the term of the new government. The new coalition led by the UML and the Maoists includes the newcomer Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) and five smaller parties. The RSP promised a break in the political wheeling-dealing (an attempt to make a deal or get an advantage by using complicated and sometimes dishonest or unfair methods) that has characterised Nepali politics but the fact that it jumped at the first chance to join an opportunist alliance — its leader Rabi Lamichhane is now Deputy Prime Minister and a Home Minister in the government — would have belied (Be in contradiction with) the hopes of its adherents.

The renewal of the alliance between the two “leftist” parties — barely years after the falling out between the UML faction led by Mr. Oli and the Maoists led to a change of government with the NC aligning with the Maoists and a smaller UML faction (a small group of people within a larger one whose members have some different aims and beliefs to those of the larger group) led by Madhav Kumar Nepal besides other parties — suggests that the loaves of power, rather than ideology or principle, are what are more tempting for Mr. Oli and Mr. Dahal. The “Left” alliance had after all broken up due to legitimate grievances with Mr. Oli’s authoritarian attitude and his manoeuvres (A plan for attaining a particular goal) to hold on to power. For Mr. Dahal to repeat his habit of performing political volte-faces (a complete change in a plan of action, opinion or policy) and to join hands with Mr. Oli despite a clear mandate for the pre-election coalition that he was a part of, suggests yet another period of opportunistic political wrangling (An instance of intense argument (as in bargaining)) that would hamper governance in Nepal. Mr. Oli has managed to make the best out of an unfavourable situation for his party by securing nominations to the post of President and Speaker from his party, reportedly as part of the arrangement with Mr. Dahal, besides gaining plum (A highly desirable position or assignment) ministerial posts to help with the usual politics of patronage (granting favours or giving contracts or making appointments to office in return for political support). But by subverting mandates for short-term gains, the Maoists and the UML are only perpetuating (Cause to continue or prevail) instability and lowering the trust of the people in the democratic system in a country that endured two upheavals (A state of violent disturbance and disorder (as in politics or social conditions generally)) to become a constitutional republic.

Want to improve your vocabulary further? Download the Lists of Word-Meanings of Previous Months here.